Click on a link below to share this article with your favourite link sharing site
-
1. Got a spring wedding in the diary? Find your perfect outfit - whatever the...
Read more -
2. Top off your spring style with one of our favourite shirts, blouses, tees ...
Read more -
3. See the Sex and the City ladies reunite on the red carpet, plus all the st...
Read more -
4. Browse our 30 top dresses under £30
Read more -
5. See the best street style looks from Ladies Day at The Cheltenham Festival
Read more
Ugly men more likely to get women pregnant
Handsome men who are lucky in love may not be the best bet as a mate for women hoping to get pregnant, researchers have said.
Uglier men with fewer notches on their belts are likely to be more productive between the sheets, it is claimed.
Research suggests that in many species, the most desirable males restrict their ‘sperm load’ with each mating to ensure enough to go around. The same could be true of humans and other primates, say scientists.
If they are right, women looking for the best chance of getting pregnant might be advised to avoid handsome lotharios. The theory proposes that males have evolved to look for the optimum ‘sperm load’ per mating. This varies depending on how many available females there are to mate with, and what the chances of mating with them are.
A smaller ‘sperm load’ reduces the chances of any individual female getting pregnant. Such a trade-off is seen in the wild and has been observed in chickens and fish.
One member of the team, PhD student Sam Tazzyman, from the Centre for Mathematics and Physics in the Life sciences and Experimental biology (CoMPLEX) at University College London, said: ‘In some species, females mate with many different males. Each male's sperm competes with that of other males in a process known as 'sperm competition'.
‘How a male negotiates this trade-off depends on how easy he finds it to attract females. The more attractive a male is, the more females will be willing to mate with him, reducing the value of each mating to him. This means it is optimal for him to contribute fewer sperm per mating.
'Although this reduces fertility per mating, it maximises the number of offspring he sires overall. Less attractive males secure fewer matings but value each of them more highly, and by allocating more sperm to each mating make the most of their meagre opportunities.’
Whether or not the same principle applied to humans and other primates was still unknown, said the researchers – but there every possibility that it did.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH NEWS
ARE YOU A TWITTERER? FOLLOW US HERE!
BECOME A MARIE CLAIRE FACEBOOK FAN HERE

Friday 10 July 2009
Rate this ...
-
Next Article
Sunbathing cancer risk overstated Read more...
-
Last Article
The fat-burning lip balm Read more...









Have your say ...