Logo_main

CELEBRITY STYLE SPY: See all the latest celeb photos Stars animation


Is Bridget Jones the new social taboo?

Posted by Katy Regan at 12:33 on 27 Jul 2009

Marie Claire News: Control Pants

Apparently, there is to be a third Bridget Jones film and possibly even a musical. ( A drunken, out of tune rendition of Ain’t No Mountain High Enough, anyone? )

Lucy Rock, writing in The Observer last week (it often takes me a week to read these things ) headine of: 'You're Yesterday's Woman Bridget'  was all-of-a-groan about this: 'So not much has changed for Bridget' she said, “she’s still self-obsessing, tottering tipsily from crisis to crisis.'

Her point was that this portrayal of a single woman in her thirties  'who set back feminism by four decades' was now  outmoded and  irrelevant: 'The world has moved on and so has the Bridget Jones generation' she says. 'We are now in our late 30s and early 40s, many of us married, perhaps juggling the demands of office life with raising children or looking after elderly parents…'

So far so fair enough, but what of the Bridget Jonest generation, who a decade on, for whatever reason, are still single?

Well, according to Lucy Rock, they are certainly not allowed to cry into their Chardonnay about this: 'What was amusing then would be infuriating and sad in a woman 10 years older…'  she says.
'We don’t need her whining about men, as though a woman without a husband is incomplete, putting back the female cause another ten years..'

Of course in theory, she is right. There are far worse fates than being single in ones 30s and it would, indeed, be sad and depressing if 'singletons'  were to spend more than perhaps one pre-menstrual, indulgent night a month singing and drinking alone in their pyjamas.

But, I can’t help but feel every time this we're-so-over-Bridget-Jones-predicament lark comes up that commentators miss the point, somewhat. Just because a decade has passed, doesn’t mean that human nature has changed. It’s perfectly sane and normal and human, whether you are man or woman, to want to share your life with someone and yet single woman all over the country feel they can’t lament their single status and that they somehow have to constantly defensively proclaim: 'Oh I love being single! I love my single life!'

I would hazard a guess, as controversial as this may be, that the vast majority of people – male andd female, single in their late thirties and forties are not single by choice. Indeed ALL my female friends and my male friends for that matter who are single, wish they weren’t.

'A new fictional heroine is needed: a woman with backbone, to inspire us in a time of global recession' trumpets Lucy Rock. 'She would be clever and witty, cultured and confident. She would enjoy fashion, flirting and parties but these things wouldn’t rule her life.'  (No shit, Sherlock.)

But she might, damn her, that entirely normal woman who is setting back the female cause by a decade,  still want a boyfriend.

I wonder if single thirty-somethings still have more in common with Bridget Jones than modern society allows them to admit and whether that by pretending that is not the case, we have created a new social taboo.

  • More about me 1

    Katy Regan
    State She's In

    Novelist and 'To Do' list addict, Katy Regan reveals all.

  • More posts

  • 9 Aug 2010

    I always said I was no good at multi-tasking. I have proved myself wrong... Read more...

  • 3 Aug 2010

    To write about dates or not to write about dates. Just write the truth, that's all because they WILL read it! Read more...

  • 26 Jul 2010

    Guy three behaved in a socially acceptable way... IF bodily functions are your thing Read more...

  • 16 Jul 2010

    I was back in an office for the first time in years this week. Great. But like white-water rafting down the Zambezi, you wouldn't want to be doing it every day... Read more...

  • 8 Jul 2010

    "I recently re-read Ulysses" he told me "I enjoyed it so much more as an adult."
    You mean to say, you read it as a child first?!.... Read more...

  • 3 Jul 2010

    So there I was, stuffing macaroons in my face, Peter Mandelson just in side view... Read more...

  • 2 Jul 2010

    Over-sharing on a date can never be a bad thing in my book (unless it's about your bowels of course but we'll come onto that next time!) Read more...

  • 25 Jun 2010

    Must have SHSOH and no colostomy bag. This is all I demanded from a man. This is pretty much all I got... Read more...

Have your say ...

Add your own comment

katy, as always, your down to earth approach is spot on.

i really cant stand when women preach to other women what they "should" think, do, feel...especially if it`s somehow connected to that notion of "in this day and age".

in this day and age dear lucy, it sets back the feminist movement a 100 years back when you scold other women for wanting whatever they want that is different from your wants.
so someone wants 5 kids and a husband by 25. someone wants neither by 50. AND?
both choices are theirs to make and the very essence of feminism - do what you want for your life, without anyone judging you if its hip or not.
and if someone cries cos they are husbandless - it certainly doesnt mean it represents all single women. there are such women, and they need their heroine too.
is it really feminist of lucy to suggest that those types should be locked away in shame and only robotic flirterers of the world should be allowed to represent us all?
we come in all shapes and sizes and lucy should really learn to be more sisterly to her sisters. broad minded and such.

on another note, im 31 and im, of recently, single. i bloody HATE it.
dear lucy is obviously too old to know what good fun is (here i am doing to her what she does to bridgetes of the world), but it sure aint enjoying fasion and art. sure, they can elevate the spirit, but they dont make you laugh till your face falls off, right (unless its lady gaga outfits you`re watching)? which is the only thing that really helps when you`re down
Comment by ana on July 27 16:31

Thought for one minute the "new fictional heroine" could be you Katy but then had another read and saw the "cultured" bit! Sorry, so close and yet so far!!!
Comment by Gareth on July 29 13:40

Just thought you would be interested to know that I spotted your book in my local library yesterday. I didn't get it out though - I already own my own copy.

Love reading the blog - keep up the good work!

Comment by Kate on July 29 14:04

I was for years a happy 'bridget jones' type and quite proud of my single status until one day I walked into a new opticians in my town. Four pairs of new specs later I had reluctantly agreed to go on a date with the optician. 14 months later and I can't imagine being single again, which gets me thinking that maybe my pride in my status was indeed a cover.

Katy I attended the publishing workshop in Leeds last night and as a result was inspired to take a look at the Marie Claire blogs. they are now bookedmarked in my favourites. hope you enjoyed your trip back to your old uni haunts!
Comment by Kate on July 30 15:09

Absolutely agree; this idea that women who think or feel a certain way are letting the side down or betraying feminism in someway is a real annoyance to me. Why it's always focused on as a failing of women, or something women have to distance themselves from when it's a perfectly understandable human trait is beyond me!
Comment by Helen LG on August 03 13:06

this Monday, after nearly 5 years with a man I ( supidly) thought was going to marry me after leaving me and returning three times has upped and left for the last time. I am almost 39 and the thought of being single again is not filling me with ANY JOY whatsoever. I will pray for Mark Darcy any time soon because I have had enough of celebrating my single life in my 20's but not when all around me friends are getting married and having kids. So shut up all of those who think we need to get out there with lipstick and atttitude when all we girls want is the comfort of a secure man who loves us.
Comment by vicky on August 06 07:34

Sorry about the late comment but I've only discovered your (brilliant may I say) blog after buying your book on Monday (also brilliant. I am actually sneak reading the end of it while I'm meant to be working because I just can't put it down!). Anyway, what I wanted to say, to Dear Lucy, is that if Bridget Jones was as she described so outmoded and irrelevant, there wouldn't be thousands of gilrs watching, and loving, the movies. Let's face it, there's a little bit of Bridget in most of us. I now found my Mr Darcy, but have not forgotten how much I hated my single days and wouldn't go back if you paid me, no matter how much my husband drives me up the wall sometimes.
Totally envy you Katy, I may no longer want to be Bridget, but I'd definitely love to be you.

Comment by Flora Lamanna on August 07 10:53


Read all 7 comments


February Subscription Offer

Plus, read our Latest blogs, enter hot competitions, and much, much more...