Logo_main

CELEBRITY STYLE SPY: See all the latest celeb photos Stars animation


The John Sergeant debacle

Posted by  at 14:52 on 19 Nov 2008

Marie Claire Blogs: Tom Gormer

Today's blog comes from HRH Janet Street-Porter.

Let us read Janet's views on Strictly Come Dancing and the whole John Sergeant debate.

Over to you Janet:

Strictly Come Dancing is the most watched television format in the world, but the judges in Britain suffer from the misapprehension that the public tune in to watch them, rather than the hard-working contestants. The truth is most viewers wouldn't recognise these petty dictators if they were on the tills at Tesco.

Furious that their judgement has been called into question by the ordinary viewing public, the judges are whingeing that dancing pig John Sergeant continues to sail through every round, boosted by the support of thousands of viewers, in spite of receiving rock-bottom votes from the professionals.

Judge Arlene Phillips claims she'd be desolate if Sergeant won. Get a grip, love! It's only entertainment! The weakest part of the show is when the cameras go backstage to catch the judges chatting while clutching their glasses of BBC plonk. They come across as stilted and corny.

Bruno was once a backing dancer for Bananarama, and craggy Cockney Len's career was confined to dance before he got his TV break at 59. It's the celebrities who make the show unmissable, not Len and co.

Here ends today's message of wisdom.

Have your say ...

Add your own comment

I profoundly disagree with Janet Street Porter. Unlike her, I really appreciate the judges' comments (including backstage). Also they are all individual "characters", entertaining in their own right, especially Bruno who is so effervescent. I don't believe for a second that the judges think viewers "tune in to watch them".
Comment by Elizabeth Cochrane on November 19 18:16

February Subscription Offer

Plus, read our Latest blogs, enter hot competitions, and much, much more...